0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Áö¿ª»çȸ ¿ä½Ç±Ý ¿©¼ºÀÇ °ñ¹ÝÀú±Ù¿îµ¿°ú ÀÚ±âÀåÀÚ±Ø È¿°úºñ±³

A Comparative Study on the Effects on Urinary Incontinence between Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise and Magnetic Stimulation Therapy

Áö¿ª»çȸ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 19±Ç 4È£ p.696 ~ 703
KMID : 0607720080190040696
Á¶¸í¼÷ ( Jo Myung-Sook ) - µ¿°­´ëÇб³ °£È£°ú

°­Çý¿µ ( Kang Hae-Young ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: To Perform a randomized comparative study investigating the effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise(PME) and Magnetic Stimulation Therapy(MST) and to identified the problems in each of PME & MST

Method: Forty-nine patients with mild stress incontinence were randomly assigned to either of two treatment
groups (24 patients in the PME group and 25 in the MST group). The PME group had a video exercising program for 40 times every day during 6 weeks. The MST group was treated with BioCon-2000TM, 2times/ week for six weeks. Pre-test and post-test were performed by Prineometer, 1-hour pad test. and Jackson¡¯s BFLUTS questionnaire of Jackson. Collected data were analysed using SAS 9.1 by frequency, Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z. Chi?Square-test, t-test, Fisher Exact probability test, Paired t-test, and Wilcoxon¡¯s rank sum test.

Results: In comparison between before and after PME and MST, statistically significant difference was observed in maximal vaginal pressure, duration of vaginal contraction, amount of urine, and symptom of urination. In the comparison of the effectiveness between PME & MST, only the maximal of vaginal pressure (Z=2.58, p= .010) was significantly different.

Conclusion: The factor more effective in the MST group than in the PME group was high compliance.
KeyWords

Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise, Magnetic Stimulation Therapy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed